Those of us who play guitar do so largely because it produces one of the
most versatile and complete sounds. Of the portable instruments, probably
only the accordion rivals it for the ability to play melody, rhythm, and
harmony all at once. When I listen to a good guitar player, I don't think
to myself "Now with some accompaniment this would sound really good."
So why is it that so many guitarists, even who are confident and comfortable
on stage with just their guitars, are so tempted to make recordings that
are far more than just a guitar? Why is it that I can listen to a 6 minute-long
song with just guitar and want to hear it again, yet if you took that same
tape to Nashville, they would say "Nice demo, now let's make a record..."
The answer has something to do with psychology and something to do with
our society.
Any solo guitar player/singer who has worked in a club knows about the 50
Tavern Favorites, as my friends and I often call them: the songs that everyone
seems to want to hear a guitar player perform. Friend of the Devil, Moondance,
American Pie, Mr Bojangles, City of New Orleans, Margaritaville, Fire &
Rain, The Gambler... The beloved guitar songs of the mass culture. You are
expected to know a lot of these songs if you want to play guitar successfully
in a tavern. Now examine the original records these came from: can you name
ONE of them that was recorded with just a guitar and voice? Not even close.
Most of them feature huge production with full rhythm section, strings,
choirs, etc. I think that part of the self-confidence and over-production
problem many guitar players have is caused by comparing oneself to commercial
music; subconsciously, when you are playing your guitar, implying a bigger
sound, trying to generate the energy by yourself that a produced commercial
record generated, it creates a feeling of inadequacy and incompleteness.
I think that years of this implied inadequacy have a residual effect on
a guitar player's self-confidence, which helps explain why so many players
overproduce their recordings, and bury their true essence. The availability
of multi-track recording is the other temptation. You go in the studio,
sing a song you usually play solo, and when you listen back to it, you may
not be happy with it. This could be for any number of reasons. It might
have been just nervousness. Performances are delicate. It might have just
not been a good performance. But over and over again I see musicians immediately
think: "What I did was fine. Obviously, this song needs something else.
Harmony? Lead guitar? Bass?..." Maybe it just needed to be played better.
Maybe the guitar part needed to be reworked. Maybe a different tuning or
a capo. Maybe change the key or the miking technique. Maybe a 12-string.
Maybe it needs to be fingerpicked rather then strummed. There are many ways
to work on a solo song to make it more effective, other than multi-tracking
over it. It is always possible to make a recording with just you, that is
complete and interesting, and no amount of added tracks is going to make
an uninteresting performance interesting. There are times when you have
played that song, and you soared like an eagle, and your listeners were
entranced. Chances are it was just you playing and singing. It's like getting
your picture taken. A bad picture does not mean you are unattractive. It
can take rolls of film to get one good picture, and recording music is the
same way, and you have to hold that pose for 3 or 4 minutes instead of 1/32nd
of a second.
There are songs that do sound better with harmony vocals. There are songs
that are improved with addition of a bass or a rhythm section. But before
you routinely do these things, dig down deep and try to find your inner
minstrel, and find that place in yourself where you and your guitar is all
you need. It's in there. It comes out at the least predictable moments,
it's an elusive pursuit, but when you finally do capture something on tape
that is just you and that sounds good, it can have a huge effect on your
confidence. If you can perform the song adequately by yourself, you can
record it adequately. It's not always easy, but it's possible. And that
recording may well make your fans happier and get you booked at more new
gigs that all the production you could ever do. Anybody can make a produced
album. But a real musician can make something musical and communicative
with or without a band. I recommend spending some time soul-searching and
learning how to capture the essence of your personal music on tape, rather
than spending lots of money piling more and more things on top of yourself,
seeking to improve the music. I think that there is a greater chance that
you will dilute and obscure what you are trying to communicate by overproducing
a recording than there is in keeping it simple and real.
©1996 by Harvey Reid
This web site
concerns the music and life of acoustic musician, writer & music educator Harvey Reid.
If you don't find what you want, or if you have comments or questions, please email to
This web site
concerns the music and life of acoustic musician, writer & music educator Harvey Reid.
If you don't find what you want, or if you have comments or questions, please email to